Untitled Document
 Register Now & Save!
Untitled Document
2009 Gold Sponsor
Untitled Document
2009 Silver Sponsor
Untitled Document
2009 Panel Sponsor
Untitled Document
2009 Exhibitors
Untitled Document
2009 Media Sponsors
Latest News
Isilon on Thursday announced that Webtrends has de...
The massive transformation of IT, driven by virtua...
Customers using SAP applications are looking towar...
Enterprises are asking their architects to create ...
Cloud computing is profoundly changing the way we ...
TrackVia, the Denver cloud-based database outfit, ...
How do you engineer life-cycle management for the ...
VMware’s best friend Cisco is going into the deskt...
What is involved in transitioning into and operati...
HP Tuesday sued its ousted CEO Mark Hurd to block ...
Can't Miss RSS Feed
Subscribe to the RSS Feed & Get All The Conference News As It Happens!
Top Ten Performance Problems
From Zappos, Monster, Thomson and other clients

For your reference, we've compiled a list of the Top 10 Performance Problems as we have seen them over the years when working with our clients. I hope this list is enlightening – and I’ve included follow-up links to the blogs to help better understand how to solve these problems:

#1: Too Many Database Calls
The problem we see the most are too many database query per request/transaction.

There are 3 specific phenomena to witness:

  1. More data is requested is than actually required in the context of the current transaction, e.g.: requesting all account information instead of those that we need to display on the current screen.
  2. The same data is requested multiple times. This usually happens when different components involved in the same transaction act independently from one another and each requests the same set of data. It is unknown what type of data has already been loaded in the current context so we end up with the same queries multiple times.
  3. Multiple queries are executed to retrieve a certain set of data. This is often a result of not taken full advantage of complex SQL statements or stored procedures to retrieve the data in one batch.

Further Reading: Blog on Linq2Sql Performance Issues on DatabaseVideo on Performance Anti-Patterns

#2: Synchronized to Death
There is no question that synchronization is necessary to protect shared data in an application. Too often developers make the mistake to over-synchronize, e.g.: excessively-large code sequences are synchronized. Under low load (on the local developers workstation) performance won’t be a problem. In a high-load or production environment over-synchronization results in severe performance and scalability problems.

Further Reading: How to identify synchronization problems under load

#3: Too chatty on the remoting channels
Many libraries out there make remote communication seem like a piece of cake. There is hardly any difference for the developer to call a local vs. remote method. The lack of understanding of what is really going on under the remoting-hood makes people forget about things like latency, serialization, network traffic and memory usage that come with every remoting call. The easy way of using these technologies results in too many calls across these remoting boundaries and in the end causes performance and scalability problems.

Further Reading: Performance Considerations in Distributed Applications

#4: Wrong usage of O/R-Mappers
Object-Relational Mappers take a big burden off developers’ shoulders – loading and persisting objects in the database. As with any framework there usually are many configuration options to optimize the usage of the O/R Mapper for current application use cases. Faulty settings and incorrect usage of the framework itself too often results in unexpected performance and scalability problems within these frameworks. Make sure you make yourself familiar with all options and learn about the internals of these libraries that you rely on.

Further Reads: Understanding Hibernate Session Cache, Understanding the Query Cache, Understanding the Second Level Cache

#5: Memory Leaks
Managed runtime environments such as Java and .NET have the advantage of helping with memory management by offering Garbage Collectors. A GC, however, does not prevent memory leaks. Objects that are “forgotten” will stick around in memory and ultimately lead to a memory leak that may cause an OutOfMemoryException. It is important to release object references as soon as they are no longer needed.

Further Read: Understanding and finding Memory Leaks

#6: Problematic Third-Party Code/Components
Nobody is writing all of the functionality of a new application on their own. We use existing 3rd party libraries to speed up our development process. Not only do we speed up our output – but we also increase performance risks introduced by these components. Even though most frameworks are well documented and have been thoroughly tested, there is no guarantee that these frameworks run as expected in every use case they are included. 3rd party code is often used incorrectly or in ways that have not been tested. It is therefore important to make an in-depth check of every framework before introducing it into your code.

Further Read: Top SharePoint Performance Mistakes

#7: Wasteful handling of scarce resources
Resources such as memory, CPU, I/O or the database are scarce. Wasteful handling of these resources results in lack of access to these resources by others and ultimately leads to performance and scalability issues. A good example: database connections that are kept open for too long. Connections must only be used for the time period they are really needed, e.g.: for a query – and then returned to the connection pool. We often see that connections are requested early on in the request handler and are not released until the very end which leads to a classic bottleneck situation.

Further Read: Resource Leak detection in .NET Applications

#8: Bloated web front ends
Thanks to high-speed web access many users have a better end-user experience in the World Wide Web. The downside of this trend is that many applications get packed with too much stuff – they become bloated – which ultimately leads to bad browsing behavior. Particularly  users that do not yet have high-speed internet access suffer the most. Too many images that are too large; failure to use or incorrect usage of the browser cache; or overly-aggressive usage of JavaScript/AJAX – all result in performance problems in the browser. Following the existing Best Practices on Web Site Performance Optimization can solve most of these problems:

Further Read: How Better Caching would help speed up Frankfurt Airport Web Site

#9: Wrong Cache Strategy leads to excessive Garbage Collection
Caching objects in memory to avoid constant roundtrips to the database is one way to boost performance. Caching too many objects – or objects that are hardly ever used quickly changes the advantage of caching into a disadvantage due to higher memory usage and increased GC activity. Before implementing a caching strategy you have to figure out which objects to cache and which objects not to cache in order to avoid these types of performance and scalability problems:

Further Reads: Java Memory Problems, Identify GC Bottlenecks in Distributed Applications

#10: Intermittent Problems
Intermittent problems are hard to find. These are usually problems that occur with specific input parameters or only happen under certain load conditions. Full test coverage – functional as well as load and performance coverage – will uncover most of these problems early on before they become real problems for real users.

Further Reads: Tracing Intermittent Errors by Lucy Monahan from Novell, How to find invisible performance problems

(Bonus Problem) #11: Expensive Serialization
With remoting communication – such as Web Services, RMI or WCF – objects need to serialized by the caller in order to be transferred over the network. The callee on the other side needs to de-serialize the object before it can be used. Transformation therefore happens on both sides of the call resulting in some overhead while doing so. It is important to understand what type of serialization is required by both ends and what the optimal choice of serialization and transport type is. Different types of serialization have a different impact on performance, scalability, memory usage and network traffic.

Further Read: Performance Considerations in Distributed Applications

Learning from Zappos, Monster & Co
We often ask our customers to tell their stories in a webinar. They share their challenges with performance management, how they overcame those challenges, and, the Best Practices they’ve developed from those experiences. I recommend listening in to the stories from Zappos, Monster, Insight, Novell, PeopleClick, SmithMicro or Thomson Reuters. You can listen to to these recorded webinars and learn to what they have to say.

Related reading:

  1. Best Practices from Zappos to deliver WOW Performance Zappos - the leading eCommerce site for shoes and apparel –...
  2. How to Find Invisible Performance Problems In the first post for this year, I will discuss...
  3. Thomson Reuters on How they deliver High Performance Online Services We have had some great Webinars with our customers in...
  4. Selected readings for my JAX London Session Here you can find some selected material on performance related...
  5. Java Memory Problems Memory Leaks and other memory related problems are among the...
About Andreas Grabner
Andreas has over a decade of experience as an architect and developer, and currently works as a senior performance architect and technology strategist for dynaTrace Software, where he influences product strategy and works closely with customers in implementing performance management solutions across the application life cycle. He is a regular speaker at software conferences, writes for a number of technology publications, and blogs at http://blog.dynatrace.com

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

Untitled Document

Call 201 802-3021 or Click Here to Save $400!

Save $400

 Sponsorship Opportunities

SYS-CON's International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo, held each year in California, New York and Prague is the leading event covering the fast-emerging Cloud Computing market for Enterprise IT professionals. Co-located with the International Virtualization Conference & Expo, the combined event will surely deliver the #1 i-Technology educational and networking opportunity of the year for those seeking to establish a market lead anywhere in the multiple layers of the Cloud Computing ecosystem.





Who Should Attend?

Senior Technologists including CIOs, CTOs, VPs of technology, IT directors and managers, network and storage managers, network engineers, enterprise architects, communications and networking specialists, directors of infrastructure Business Executives including CEOs, CMOs, CIOs, presidents, VPs, directors, business development; product and purchasing managers.


Video Coverage of Cloud Computing Expo

Brian Stevens: The Opening of Virtualization
Jon Wallace: User Environment Management – The Third Layer of the Desktop
Brian Duckering & Ken Berryman: Managing Hybrid Endpoint Environments
Preeti Somal: Game-Changing Technology for Enterprise Cloud and Applications

 Conference Media Sponsor: Cloud Computing Journal

Cloud Computing Journal aims to help open the eyes of Enterprise IT professionals to the economics and strategies that utility/cloud computing provides. Cloud computing - the provision of scalable IT resources as a service, using Internet technologies - potentially impacts every aspect of how IT deploys and operates software.

Government IT Conference & Expo 2009
Allstar Conference Faculty Lineup Will Include...


CHEVALIER

Novell Canada

DICARLO

Sun Micosystems

FOXWELL

Sun Microsystems Federal

GABHART

Web Age Solutions

GREENBERG

Integralis

HAHN

Tranxition

WILLIAMS

Maxworks

JACKSON

Dataline, LLC

KHOSLA

IBM

KRZYSKO

US Departement of Defense

LIBERMAN

Lieberman Software

MARKS

AgilePath

MORGENTHAL

QinetiQ North America

RYAN

Asankya

TRAJMAN

Vertica

WHITE

BDNA


SYS-CON EVENTS


Past Events Archive

Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
2009 East

cloudcomputingexpo
2009east.sys-con.com/
Virtualization Conference & Expo
2009 East

virtualizationconference
2009east.sys-con.com/
Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
2008 West

cloudcomputingexpo
2008west.sys-con.com/
SOAWorld Conference & Expo 2008 West
soaworld2008.com/
Virtualization Conference & Expo 2008 West
virtualizationconference
2008west.sys-con.com
AJAXWorld Conference & Expo 2008 West
ajaxoct08.sys-con.com
SOAWorld Conference & Expo 2008 East
soa2008east.sys-con.com
Virtualization Conference & Expo 2008 East
virt2008east.sys-con.com
AJAXWorld 2008 Conference & Expo East
ajaxmar08.sys-con.com
SOAWorld Conference & Expo 2007 West
www.soaworld2007.com
Virtualization Conference & Expo 2007 West
virt2007west.sys-con.com
AJAXWorld 2007 Conference & Expo West
ajaxoct07.sys-con.com

Cloud Computing Expo Alumni Delegates Represents...

• AccuRev
• Adea Solutions
• Adobe Systems, Inc [3 delegates]
• ADP
• Aeropostale, Inc
• Aetna
• Akbank Training Center
• American Family Insurance
• American International College
• American Modern Insurance
• Amphion Innovations
• Amplify LLC, Clipmarks [2 delegates]
• Anderson Consulting
• Arrow Electronics [3 delegates]
• Ashcroft Inc
• Athabasca University
• ATS
• Audatex
• Avanade, Inc.
• Avaya Inc. [5 delegates]
• Azul [2 delegates]
• Backbase [2 delegates]
• Bank of America
• Bank of NY
• Barnes and Noble
• Barnex Investment International Limited
• BEA
• Bear Stearns [2 delegates]
• Bendel Newspaper Company Limited
• BizInnovative
• Bloomberg [2 delegates]
• BlueBrick Inc.
• BMC Software
• Boeing
• Bottomline Technologies [2 delegates]
• BP
• Broadcom

   read more...
Cloud Computing Blogs
In other words, VMware’s server density is higher. Boles suggests this means that customers should be “assessing virtualisation on a ‘cost per application’ basis. VM density has a sign
Traditionally, the way people have implemented high availability is by using a high-availability management package like Linux-HA[1], then configure it in detail for each application, file system moun