Untitled Document
 Register Now & Save!
Untitled Document
2009 Gold Sponsor
Untitled Document
2009 Silver Sponsor
Untitled Document
2009 Panel Sponsor
Untitled Document
2009 Exhibitors
Untitled Document
2009 Media Sponsors
Latest News
On Tuesday, Clustrix announced the availability of...
EMC moved to make Hadoop safe for the Joe Blow big...
Amazon has reined in the price of its S3 storage a...
The focus of Java EE 7 is on the cloud, and specif...
2011 was a year of rapid adoption for public and p...
AMD Thursday told financial analysts it’s gonna tr...
SYS-CON Events announced today that ScaleOut Softw...
Acer has sued its former CEO Gianfranco Lanci in M...
Virtualization and private cloud are good for serv...
Regulation of consumer and corporate data is incre...
Can't Miss RSS Feed
Subscribe to the RSS Feed & Get All The Conference News As It Happens!
Log for Better Clouds - Part 8: Cloud Portability
What happens with logs when the honeymoon is over?

Cloud Portability.

(In the context of Logs of course!!)

So the honeymoon is over.

The Cloud Provider that you so carefully selected is not performing like you expected and you are eying the competition.  You might even be considering re-insourcing back some of your IT services.

So what happens to all the logs? As a customer, can you Trust that your Provider(s) will not let you down and mess with your logs?

Well, first off, whose logs are they?  Are they the Provider's logs because they are logs generated by their physical equipment, or are these your logs because they trace your applications and your virtual systems?

Actually they're both at the same time. Let's see why both parties would need access to the logs and reports.

From a Customer perspective, logs are important because they are an indication of my business processes and I need visibility in those. I need visibility in the usage of my applications, for such purpose as trending and capacity planning.  I also need them for internal reports, to tell the Business Units how they fared and I probably need them for chargeback.

For example, say that I'm using a Platform as a Service Provider to host applications that are enabling my sales team to better serve my customers. What is the usage trending of that application?  Is the application's take rate growing or did we reach a peak and we need to reinvent ourselves?  What kind of horsepower do we need to insure good quality of service and make sure that our applications are humming? How much do I need to bill each BU for their fair share of usage? Can I use this usage information to select my next Provider? What kind of usage expectations do I need to raise? All of these questions are very valid questions, and they can be answered by logs, more specifically by the reports on logs.

Providers have questions of their own, questions dealing with the most popular services and systems, usage trending over time with granularity on time of the day or period in the year, where should resources be focused on, what's the take rate on offers, where to better market them, what are the different services take rate, how much to charge customers?  All of these are questions can be answered with logs and log reports, so Providers also need to keep these logs.

OK, so both parties need to keep the logs or at least reports on the logs.

As a customer, I understand why my Provider needs to generate a last set of report from "my" logs, and I will let him do it provided that I get the guarantee that he will not be able to use this data to infer information about my business. Who knows, maybe he just signed my worst competitor as a client and might be tempted to give him access to my logs?  The Provider can use and generate reports based on my logs, but is not allowed to access the raw logs anymore.

And because I am changing Providers, there is no reason why I should still have access to (old) raw logs anymore, I'm not paying usage fee anymore...  and by the same token I need a last set of reports based on "my" logs.

So the solution could be that raw logs are still being stored a while longer, but they are quarantined, they are still there and available in case of dispute, and in case Law Enforcement needs access to raw logs but otherwise they can't be accessed.

Logs end up in a quarantined bucket for both parties and any/all access to the raw logs or generation of reports should trigger alerts that are sent to both parties so that way there are proper checks and balances on the raw log access and on the report generation.  This bucket does not necessarily need to be a physical bucket, it can be a logical one, all we need is a segregation mechanism that prevents unapproved accesses or at least alerts on these accesses.

Techniques for segregation have existed in the Industry for several years, for example this is exactly how accesses are mediated in DataWarehouse, all data is mixed together - including several owners' data - and access mediation is done at the logical level.

Phew, so are we done with Trust?

In absolute terms we will never be done with Trust.  Building Trust is a process, not an event, and all parties need to constantly make efforts so that everybody else's level of Trust is maintained and better yet improved.

I hope that by now both Providers and Customers trust each other a little bit more thanks to logs; how logs have been collected, how we can prove their integrity, higher-level reports that use them, and can then engage in a mutually-beneficial business relationship.

Next time, we'll talk about some specific use cases, starting with Pay Per Use.  Stay tuned!

About Gorka Sadowski
Gorka is an expert in Governance and Risk Management. He spent the last 20 years helping large enterprises use technology to automate and enable their business processes, and allowing solution providers to better position, sell and market their solutions to the marketplace. He is today involved with technology-related activities for large end-clients and strategic partners for LogLogic in Europe. Gorka was Director of the Security Group for Unisys France, leading a team of security consultants and managing the integration of complex solutions for global CAC40 corporations. He spent 15 years in the USA, where he was Director of Emerging Technologies at NetScreen in the Silicon Valley. Gorka also held the position of Director of the Security Group for CTP, a software development firm specialized in the design and implementation of custom business applications for the largest companies in America.

Untitled Document

Call 201 802-3021 or Click Here to Save $400!

Save $400

 Sponsorship Opportunities

SYS-CON's International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo, held each year in California, New York and Prague is the leading event covering the fast-emerging Cloud Computing market for Enterprise IT professionals. Co-located with the International Virtualization Conference & Expo, the combined event will surely deliver the #1 i-Technology educational and networking opportunity of the year for those seeking to establish a market lead anywhere in the multiple layers of the Cloud Computing ecosystem.





Who Should Attend?

Senior Technologists including CIOs, CTOs, VPs of technology, IT directors and managers, network and storage managers, network engineers, enterprise architects, communications and networking specialists, directors of infrastructure Business Executives including CEOs, CMOs, CIOs, presidents, VPs, directors, business development; product and purchasing managers.


Video Coverage of Cloud Computing Expo

Brian Stevens: The Opening of Virtualization
Jon Wallace: User Environment Management – The Third Layer of the Desktop
Brian Duckering & Ken Berryman: Managing Hybrid Endpoint Environments
Preeti Somal: Game-Changing Technology for Enterprise Cloud and Applications

 Conference Media Sponsor: Cloud Computing Journal

Cloud Computing Journal aims to help open the eyes of Enterprise IT professionals to the economics and strategies that utility/cloud computing provides. Cloud computing - the provision of scalable IT resources as a service, using Internet technologies - potentially impacts every aspect of how IT deploys and operates software.

Government IT Conference & Expo 2009
Allstar Conference Faculty Lineup Will Include...


CHEVALIER

Novell Canada

DICARLO

Sun Micosystems

FOXWELL

Sun Microsystems Federal

GABHART

Web Age Solutions

GREENBERG

Integralis

HAHN

Tranxition

WILLIAMS

Maxworks

JACKSON

Dataline, LLC

KHOSLA

IBM

KRZYSKO

US Departement of Defense

LIBERMAN

Lieberman Software

MARKS

AgilePath

MORGENTHAL

QinetiQ North America

RYAN

Asankya

TRAJMAN

Vertica

WHITE

BDNA


SYS-CON EVENTS


Past Events Archive

Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
2009 East

cloudcomputingexpo
2009east.sys-con.com/
Virtualization Conference & Expo
2009 East

virtualizationconference
2009east.sys-con.com/
Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
2008 West

cloudcomputingexpo
2008west.sys-con.com/
SOAWorld Conference & Expo 2008 West
soaworld2008.com/
Virtualization Conference & Expo 2008 West
virtualizationconference
2008west.sys-con.com
AJAXWorld Conference & Expo 2008 West
ajaxoct08.sys-con.com
SOAWorld Conference & Expo 2008 East
soa2008east.sys-con.com
Virtualization Conference & Expo 2008 East
virt2008east.sys-con.com
AJAXWorld 2008 Conference & Expo East
ajaxmar08.sys-con.com
SOAWorld Conference & Expo 2007 West
www.soaworld2007.com
Virtualization Conference & Expo 2007 West
virt2007west.sys-con.com
AJAXWorld 2007 Conference & Expo West
ajaxoct07.sys-con.com

Cloud Computing Expo Alumni Delegates Represents...

• AccuRev
• Adea Solutions
• Adobe Systems, Inc [3 delegates]
• ADP
• Aeropostale, Inc
• Aetna
• Akbank Training Center
• American Family Insurance
• American International College
• American Modern Insurance
• Amphion Innovations
• Amplify LLC, Clipmarks [2 delegates]
• Anderson Consulting
• Arrow Electronics [3 delegates]
• Ashcroft Inc
• Athabasca University
• ATS
• Audatex
• Avanade, Inc.
• Avaya Inc. [5 delegates]
• Azul [2 delegates]
• Backbase [2 delegates]
• Bank of America
• Bank of NY
• Barnes and Noble
• Barnex Investment International Limited
• BEA
• Bear Stearns [2 delegates]
• Bendel Newspaper Company Limited
• BizInnovative
• Bloomberg [2 delegates]
• BlueBrick Inc.
• BMC Software
• Boeing
• Bottomline Technologies [2 delegates]
• BP
• Broadcom

   read more...
Cloud Computing Blogs
In other words, VMware’s server density is higher. Boles suggests this means that customers should be “assessing virtualisation on a ‘cost per application’ basis. VM density has a sign
Traditionally, the way people have implemented high availability is by using a high-availability management package like Linux-HA[1], then configure it in detail for each application, file system moun